I call Doha the bridge to home. As a bideshi living in the UK, it is the place in-between, before flying over to Kathmandu.
Doha made me reflect on my people – while it is just a transitory stop for me, it is a dark place for hundreds of Nepali migrant workers who have left home in search of foreign employment. According to Humanity United, Nepali migrant workers make up an estimated 12.5% of Qatar’s entire population.
Despite Doha’s ‘glitz and glam’, like Nepal, Doha reminds me of the deep-seated inequalities between the elite and everyday working citizens.
1600 Nepalis workers leave the country every day, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). 740,000 labour permits alone were issued in the fiscal year of 2023/24. Labour migration shapes Nepal’s socio-economic landscape, with the economy heavily dependent on agriculture and remittances – remittances accounting for over one-fifth of Nepal’s national income. Having faced a number of political changes over the years, youth unemployment is especially high estimating 20% in 2024.
Witnessing the political turmoil and unrest that toppled the Oli government a few months ago, I understood the deep wounds of my nation. Plagued by a lack of opportunities within the country, deep social inequalities and overall disillusionment fuelled by government negligence, nepotism and corruption, youth-led Gen-Z protests voiced these concerns and demandsfor systemic change and transparency. What made the movement powerful and effective was its decentralised organising facilitated by social media, ‘waking up’ decades of public anger and creating waves of resistance after the trigger of a government social media ban.
When hundreds of citizens have no option but to emigrate or migrate in search for work everyday, the country’s economic, political and social developments are challenged. The cultural fabric of society erodes, slowly made destitute, because people make a nation, not governments or elites.
The ILO states Nepali migrant workers are the ‘lifeline’ of the country’s economy. But Nepal’s remittance-driven economy is a symptom of a larger problem: it points to the underlying issues within society’s fabric such as the lack of income-generating opportunities, liveable wages, poverty (a quarter of Nepal’s population live below the poverty line) and high unemployment particularly among youths, triggering anti-corruption protests by Gen-Z in September 2025. While the dependency on remittance from families abroad is evident on ‘household and national levels’, supporting family income in Nepali households, reducing poverty and upholding Nepal’s economy, Bhim Prasad Subedi, Professor of Geography states, ‘while remittances provide essential income for families, they often fail to contribute to long-term, sustainable development.’
Nepal has a long history of labor migration linked to British colonial interest, for example, the recruitment of the Gurkhas in the British Army since the 1800s until today. There is also a higher prevalence of men undertaking foreign employment according to national figures. It is estimated that 3.5 million Nepali people (14% of total population) are working abroad, primarily in Malaysia, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) made up of six countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, and India, according to MIDEQ. The top country of destination for Nepali migrant workers is Malaysia.
What is clear in such cases of labour migration, from the Gurkhas to Nepali migrant workers has been the demand for cheap labour, facilitated by both domestic and employing countries.
What is the true cost of Nepali migrant labour?
Since Qatar was awarded the 2022 FIFA Men’s World Cup in 2010, it paved way for the ‘Nepal-Qatar migration corridor’.
Aspiring to go abroad for work and a chance to make a new life, Humanity United reports how Nepali migrant workers in Qatar are met with the ‘typical’ experiences many labour migrants face far from home: ’excessive and illegal recruitment fees for access to jobs’, pressure to take out ‘high-interest loans’ and other financial sacrifices. Once in the destination country, they are further subjected to seized passports and ‘contract substitution’ where the initial terms and conditions of the job description is altered from the original offer. ‘Wage theft’ is unfortunately also rampant, leading to debt bondage and a precarious cycle of abusive working and living conditions with uncertain pay or to return home in financial debt. According to the Labour Migration Report, Nepali migrant workers are mainly carrying out ‘low-wage labour’ in construction, manufacturing, domestic work and security – every step of going bidesh results in a sacrifice.
It is no doubt that human rights organisations and international news outlets have reported on the exploitation Nepali migrant workers have faced in the Gulf region over the years, with Amnesty International releasing a prominent report in 2017.
Dinesh* who currently works in Malaysia as a security guard, is on a typical work contract of 3 years. He told me he was able to secure the job by directly applying to the company through a friend recommendation. While he paid NPR 100,000 to the company, others paid double the amount due to having to go through agents which was a longer process and brought extra frees. He says the Malaysian government prioritises Nepali workers like him for security roles due to their trustworthy reputation. He works 12 hours shifts, 30 days with no days off. Being on standby 24 hours, he is only given a 10-15 minutes lunch break as he has to also consider the other Nepali security guards on duty. He believes both governments, managers, staff and locals could support Nepali migrant workers by following and enacting laws and procedures in and out of the work place.
Amnesty International reports how there is a disparity between the investment labour migrants make to Nepal’s economy, and the government’s investment in the ‘safety, rights, dignity, and long-term welfare of labour migrants’: in fact, less than 1% of the state’s national budget is allocated annually to government departments mandated to protect labour migrants. Nepali migrant labour exploitation still remains prominent where they continue to face discrimination through recruitment and wage deception, harsh working and living conditions and wage inequality such as being systematically paid less than other foreign workers, with lack of enforcement of minimum wage policies by the Nepali government challenging host countries as such.
The problem with Nepal’s remittance-driven economy is that it lacks self-sufficiency, driven by government negligence. While money flows in, people’s labour is systemically driven out, no longer contributing to society productively in a large scale which significantly impacts the health of the economy.
The primary concern is enforcement of ethical labour policies and procedures by the Nepali government, and domestic recruiting agencies and agents to ensure recruitment transparency, fair working conditions, and stronger protections for Nepali migrant workers abroad that sets the benchmark for overseas employers to then follow through. The upcoming government must enforce routine labour inspections and minimum wage policies, and factor in increasing investment in the migration budget sector to meet ongoing labour concerns.
*anonymised name

